Credibility Problem

Former President Clinton`s National Security Advisor pleads guilty to stealing and destroying classified documents and we have to read about it on the internet because the Mainstream Press doesn`t think it newsworthy, although they continue to circle Karl Rove like sharks after a baby seal. What was in those documents that was so important that Berger was willing to commit a crime? Why doesn`t the press care?

Let me see if I understand this; an accidental leak of a once undercover CIA employee`s name is BIG NEWS while a former National Security Advisor stealing and destroying classified documents is unimportant?

And the press wonders why they have credibility problems.