Cool to Warming in Australia
An Australian Cardinal looks at Global Warming.
(Thanks, Dave-O):
Sunday Telegraph (Australia)
Keeping a cool head amid warming hysteria
By CARDINAL GEORGE PELL
Opinion / Op Ed; Pg. 81
February 18, 2007
Global-warming doomsayers were out and about in a big way recently,
but the rain came in central Queensland, then here in Sydney.
January also was unusually cool.
We have been subjected to a lot of nonsense about climate disasters,
as some zealots have been presenting extreme scenarios to frighten us.
They claim ocean levels are about to rise spectacularly, there could
be the occasional tsunami as high as an eight-storey building, and the
Amazon Basin could be destroyed as the ice cap in the Arctic and
Greenland melts.
An overseas magazine called for Nuremberg-style trials for
global-warming skeptics, and a US television correspondent compared
skeptics to ''Holocaust deniers''.
A local newspaper editorial's complaint about the doomsayers'
religious enthusiasm is unfair to mainstream Christianity.
Christians don't go against reason, although we sometimes go beyond it
in faith to embrace the probabilities.
What we were seeing from the doomsayers was an induced dose of mild
hysteria -- semi-religious if you like, but dangerously close to
superstition.
I'm deeply skeptical about man-made catastrophic global warming, but
still open to further evidence.
I would be surprised if industrial pollution and carbon emissions had
no ill-effects at all.
But enough is enough.
A few fixed points may provide light on the subject.
We know that enormous climate changes have occurred in world history
-- for example, the ice ages and Noah's flood, when human causation
could only have been negligible.
Nor should it be too surprising to learn that during the past 100
years, the media has alternated between promoting fear of anew ice age
and fear of global warming.
Terrible droughts are not infrequent in Australian history, sometimes
lasting seven or eight years.
We all know that a cool January doesn't mean much in the long run.
But neither does evidence based on only a few years.
Scaremongers have used temperature fluctuations over limited periods
and in a few places to misrepresent longer patterns.
Warming evidence is mixed and often exaggerated but can be reassuring.
Global warming has been increasing constantly since 1975 at the rate
of less than one-fifth of a degree
Celsius per decade.
The concentration of carbon dioxide increased surface temperatures
more in winter than in summer, especially in mid and high latitudes
over land, while there was a global cooling of the stratosphere.
Britain's University of East Anglia climate research unit found global
temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2005, and a NASA satellite
recently found the southern hemisphere had not warmed in the past 25
years.
Is mild global warming a northern phenomenon?
We may have been alarmed by the sighting of an iceberg as large as an
aircraft carrier off Dunedin, but we should be consoled by the news
that the Antarctic is getting colder and the ice is growing there.
The science is certainly more complicated than the propaganda.
(Thanks, Dave-O):
Sunday Telegraph (Australia)
Keeping a cool head amid warming hysteria
By CARDINAL GEORGE PELL
Opinion / Op Ed; Pg. 81
February 18, 2007
Global-warming doomsayers were out and about in a big way recently,
but the rain came in central Queensland, then here in Sydney.
January also was unusually cool.
We have been subjected to a lot of nonsense about climate disasters,
as some zealots have been presenting extreme scenarios to frighten us.
They claim ocean levels are about to rise spectacularly, there could
be the occasional tsunami as high as an eight-storey building, and the
Amazon Basin could be destroyed as the ice cap in the Arctic and
Greenland melts.
An overseas magazine called for Nuremberg-style trials for
global-warming skeptics, and a US television correspondent compared
skeptics to ''Holocaust deniers''.
A local newspaper editorial's complaint about the doomsayers'
religious enthusiasm is unfair to mainstream Christianity.
Christians don't go against reason, although we sometimes go beyond it
in faith to embrace the probabilities.
What we were seeing from the doomsayers was an induced dose of mild
hysteria -- semi-religious if you like, but dangerously close to
superstition.
I'm deeply skeptical about man-made catastrophic global warming, but
still open to further evidence.
I would be surprised if industrial pollution and carbon emissions had
no ill-effects at all.
But enough is enough.
A few fixed points may provide light on the subject.
We know that enormous climate changes have occurred in world history
-- for example, the ice ages and Noah's flood, when human causation
could only have been negligible.
Nor should it be too surprising to learn that during the past 100
years, the media has alternated between promoting fear of anew ice age
and fear of global warming.
Terrible droughts are not infrequent in Australian history, sometimes
lasting seven or eight years.
We all know that a cool January doesn't mean much in the long run.
But neither does evidence based on only a few years.
Scaremongers have used temperature fluctuations over limited periods
and in a few places to misrepresent longer patterns.
Warming evidence is mixed and often exaggerated but can be reassuring.
Global warming has been increasing constantly since 1975 at the rate
of less than one-fifth of a degree
Celsius per decade.
The concentration of carbon dioxide increased surface temperatures
more in winter than in summer, especially in mid and high latitudes
over land, while there was a global cooling of the stratosphere.
Britain's University of East Anglia climate research unit found global
temperatures did not rise between 1998 and 2005, and a NASA satellite
recently found the southern hemisphere had not warmed in the past 25
years.
Is mild global warming a northern phenomenon?
We may have been alarmed by the sighting of an iceberg as large as an
aircraft carrier off Dunedin, but we should be consoled by the news
that the Antarctic is getting colder and the ice is growing there.
The science is certainly more complicated than the propaganda.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home