Deathhead Dinner Hour
As you all know, I have made the argument that the left-particularly the pro-abortion, pro-euthenasia crowd-has a certain attraction to the concept of death. I like to call them Deathheads because, like groupies, they follow the grim reaper in morbid fascination, and defend the ``right to die`` wherever and whenever possible. This story in World Net Daily takes the Deathhead concept to a new low; no longer content to merely observe and assist, this disturbed Deathhead has gone boldly into the final frontier, fulfilling his lust for the grave in the most disgusting manner possible.
The interesting thing is that the Law is powerless to punish this behavior. Cannibalism is illegal, but, since a fetus is not considered a human being by the wisdom of the Supreme Court, it is perfectly legal to dine away on the remains of the poor aborted child (or blend into a smoothie, as our bon-vivant Deathhead apparently enjoys) and society can do nothing to stop him.
This should hardly surprise us; it is natural for barbarity to breed greater barbarity, and ripping a child out of her mother`s womb is a foul, barbaric act. We have become increasingly desensitized to such abominations, and someone with a morbid obsession will find it increasingly hard to get their adrenal kicks by merely WATCHING a baby die.
Bon Appetite!
(Thanks and salutations to Gindy for this foul bit of news.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: June 18, 2005
10:00 p.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
Ever since the story broke about a Kansas City abortionist accused of eating fetuses questions have been raised about why he wasn't charged with a crime besides losing his medical license.
The short answer, according to law enforcement authorities involved in the investigation of Krishna Rajanna, is: Because there are no laws against eating fetuses.
After being provided information about horrific conditions of a Kansas abortion clinic nearly two years ago, the Kansas state board in charge of regulating such facilities took months to investigate it and even longer to shut it down.
As WorldNetDaily reported, Krishna Rajanna's clinic was closed in March, but only after the testimony of law enforcement agents who investigated the grisly charges – including one employee's contention the abortionist microwaved a fetus and stirred it into his lunch.
The accusation was made by clinic staffer Julia Walton Garcia.
"Julia went on to describe how she and the other girls actually witnessed Rajanna microwave one of the aborted fetuses and stir it into his lunch," explained Detective William Howard of the Kansas City Police Department, the investigating officer. "Julia claimed that she shared this (information) with some of the other employees, who confirmed that they had seen him do the very same thing."
Howard was so disturbed by the charge that he took Garcia to the office of Nick Tomasic, the district attorney for Wyandotte County. Though Howard told Garcia that lying to a district attorney would be a serious offense, she told the same story to Tomasic.
But Tomasic's hands were tied. There were no laws on the books to prohibit an abortionist – or anyone else – from eating a human unborn baby.
Rajanna announced this week he would appeal the revocation of his medical license by the Kansas Board of Healing Arts.
Krishna Rajanna's license was pulled last Saturday. The unanimous decision ended a drawn-out battle that included startling allegations against Rajanna.
The board unanimously ruled that Rajanna's license should be pulled after a series of inspections turned up such things as a dead mouse in the clinic hallway, filled syringes in an unlocked refrigerator, carpet in a surgical area and a facility that was generally unkempt.
Rajanna has denied those charges as well. The accusation by Garcia was also raised in a legislative hearing earlier this year.
Rajanna denies the claim and points out that it was made by a disgruntled employee who was later fired.
"They're just making it up with no proof whatsoever," he told the Kansas City Star. "We're always under attack. It's not something new. They would always take a lie and make it as big as can be and that's exactly what is happening," he said.
Rajanna first came to the attention of police in September 2003 when he called the cops to investigate alleged employee theft. Howard responded.
"I thought I had heard and seen every vile, disgusting crime scene, but was in for a new shock when I started this investigation," he would say later. Howard turned the matter over to the local district attorney and three state agencies.
While Rajanna denied the accusation about eating fetuses, he did keep fetuses in Styrofoam cups in the refrigerator along with food and drink
The interesting thing is that the Law is powerless to punish this behavior. Cannibalism is illegal, but, since a fetus is not considered a human being by the wisdom of the Supreme Court, it is perfectly legal to dine away on the remains of the poor aborted child (or blend into a smoothie, as our bon-vivant Deathhead apparently enjoys) and society can do nothing to stop him.
This should hardly surprise us; it is natural for barbarity to breed greater barbarity, and ripping a child out of her mother`s womb is a foul, barbaric act. We have become increasingly desensitized to such abominations, and someone with a morbid obsession will find it increasingly hard to get their adrenal kicks by merely WATCHING a baby die.
Bon Appetite!
(Thanks and salutations to Gindy for this foul bit of news.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: June 18, 2005
10:00 p.m. Eastern
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com
Ever since the story broke about a Kansas City abortionist accused of eating fetuses questions have been raised about why he wasn't charged with a crime besides losing his medical license.
The short answer, according to law enforcement authorities involved in the investigation of Krishna Rajanna, is: Because there are no laws against eating fetuses.
After being provided information about horrific conditions of a Kansas abortion clinic nearly two years ago, the Kansas state board in charge of regulating such facilities took months to investigate it and even longer to shut it down.
As WorldNetDaily reported, Krishna Rajanna's clinic was closed in March, but only after the testimony of law enforcement agents who investigated the grisly charges – including one employee's contention the abortionist microwaved a fetus and stirred it into his lunch.
The accusation was made by clinic staffer Julia Walton Garcia.
"Julia went on to describe how she and the other girls actually witnessed Rajanna microwave one of the aborted fetuses and stir it into his lunch," explained Detective William Howard of the Kansas City Police Department, the investigating officer. "Julia claimed that she shared this (information) with some of the other employees, who confirmed that they had seen him do the very same thing."
Howard was so disturbed by the charge that he took Garcia to the office of Nick Tomasic, the district attorney for Wyandotte County. Though Howard told Garcia that lying to a district attorney would be a serious offense, she told the same story to Tomasic.
But Tomasic's hands were tied. There were no laws on the books to prohibit an abortionist – or anyone else – from eating a human unborn baby.
Rajanna announced this week he would appeal the revocation of his medical license by the Kansas Board of Healing Arts.
Krishna Rajanna's license was pulled last Saturday. The unanimous decision ended a drawn-out battle that included startling allegations against Rajanna.
The board unanimously ruled that Rajanna's license should be pulled after a series of inspections turned up such things as a dead mouse in the clinic hallway, filled syringes in an unlocked refrigerator, carpet in a surgical area and a facility that was generally unkempt.
Rajanna has denied those charges as well. The accusation by Garcia was also raised in a legislative hearing earlier this year.
Rajanna denies the claim and points out that it was made by a disgruntled employee who was later fired.
"They're just making it up with no proof whatsoever," he told the Kansas City Star. "We're always under attack. It's not something new. They would always take a lie and make it as big as can be and that's exactly what is happening," he said.
Rajanna first came to the attention of police in September 2003 when he called the cops to investigate alleged employee theft. Howard responded.
"I thought I had heard and seen every vile, disgusting crime scene, but was in for a new shock when I started this investigation," he would say later. Howard turned the matter over to the local district attorney and three state agencies.
While Rajanna denied the accusation about eating fetuses, he did keep fetuses in Styrofoam cups in the refrigerator along with food and drink
posted by Timothy Birdnow | 8:02 AM
4 Comments:
I gotta tell you, this story smells of absurdity. I suspect Snopes will have something shortly saying this whole thing is baloney (so to speak).
Abortion is a horrible, gut-wrenching decision that I don't know of any woman taking lightly. It's easy for a guy (sorry, easy pot-shot, i realize) to sit in judgement when he doesn't have to worry about it. Personally, I think when men are able to carry the kid to term, then they can weigh in on the discussion (as a general rule; certainly they can on a specific case if they're the father).
If there are women who don't take it lightly, then why are there women who have had multiple abortions as if it were an acceptable means of birth control? Have they not figured out the cause of pregnancy?
Tim, I really dropped by to thanks you for the fantastic comments you left on my site. Thanks!
Hi Esther! It`s always good to hear from you!
I hope you are right and this thing turns out to be a hoax. I hate to think that an M.D. would be such a twisted sicko! (That`s why I made some light-hearted comments in my foreward to the story-I suspect it may not be completely true.)
I make a point not to condemn the women who are having the abortions. I realize that many are terrified young teenagers or are being pressured in some way, and they are taking what they see as the sensible path. (although BobG is right-there are women who use it as an alternative form of birth control.) They are mistaken, and I see them as victims of the abortionists who tempt these confused young mothers with an easy, attractive answer.
Further, I do not lump people who honestly believe that abortion is a sad but necessary proceedure under the moniker Deathheads. NARAL, Planned Parenthood, the NOW gang, etc. I refer to as Deathheads; these groups use abortion as a sort of blood sacrament to bind women to their leftist cause. They use death as an empowering element, and that is why they are so vociferous about their views. They will allow absolutely no restrictions-not even for partial birth abortion which is clearly, undeniably infanticide (the baby is born except the head into which the doctor sticks an icepick! This is death for death`s sake! This is blood sacrifice for their cause! They are Deathheads!
Bob, thanks for dropping by! I always like hearing from you, and greatly respect your opinion!
The women who use it as birth control are wrong, absolutely. BUT they are certainly not the norm. And they shouldn't be held as the example as to why it shouldn't be "safe, legal and rare" for the rest of the women out there.
I don't think any doctor is "tempting" a woman to have this done. I'm sure most doctors would love to stop having to do abortions. No one goes home with a big smile on their face thinking what a great day it was to perform them but I most certainly appreciate the service they are providing.
As for your DeadHeads, the groups you mention are made up mostly of women who were either denied the right (pre- Roe v. Wade) or are incredibly grateful it was there and want to make sure it stays safe, legal and rare....they don't crave death.
As for women getting late-term abortions.... that I don't support unless it's deemed necessary to save the woman's life. But if the kid is old enough that it can live outside the mother's womb, then every effort should be made to do just that.
Post a Comment
<< Home